Biostatistics Seminar Series

## Sensitivity analysis via the proportion of unmeasured confounding -Edward Kennedy, Carnegie Mellon U

Thursday 1/23 3:30PM - 4:30PM

Public Health Lecture Hall (A115)

Public Health Lecture Hall (A115)

**Sensitivity analysis via the proportion of unmeasured confounding**

Edward Kennedy, PhD, Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University

In observational studies, identification of causal effects is generally achieved by assuming "no unmeasured confounding," possibly after conditioning on enough covariates. Because this assumption is both strong and untestable, a sensitivity analysis should be performed. Common approaches include modeling the bias directly or varying the propensity scores to probe the effects of a potential unmeasured confounder. In this paper, we take a novel approach whereby the sensitivity parameter is the proportion of unmeasured confounding. We consider different assumptions on the probability of a unit being confounded. In each case, we derive sharp bounds on the average treatment effect as a function of the sensitivity parameter and propose nonparametric estimators that allow flexible covariate adjustment. We also introduce a one-number summary of a study's robustness to the number of confounded units. Finally, we explore finite-sample properties via simulation, and apply the methods to an observational database used to assess the effects of right heart catheterization.

Last Updated On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 by Wang, Jiebiao

Created On Wednesday, December 18, 2019